Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0

In this tutorial, we will learn about Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0. Let’s start!!!

Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web3

We could all agree that now the web has evolved dramatically over time, both as a customer and a developer. Producing appealing websites and web applications was never easier due to internet breakthroughs.

But “What exactly is web 2.0?” This is a frequently asked question. It is likely that there are as many answers as there are people who use the term. However, since talk of web 3.0 has emerged in the last year or so, it appears that an entirely new level of confusion has set in. In this article, we’ll describe the discrepancy between web 2.0 and web 3.0 and how they pertain to your ecommerce store.

We’ll begin with the issues that cause people to consider web 2.0 and web 3.0. Because these are buzzwords with no clear definitions, consider this an attempt to explain an ever web. We’ll take a cue from Tim Berners-Lee, the World Wide Web Consortium’s general manager and the creator of the Internet.

Web 1.0

Web 1.0 refers to the very first phase of the evolution of the World Wide Web. Previously, there were only about a few content makers in Web 1.0, with the vast majority of users being content customers. Personal websites were standard, consisting of static websites hosted on ISP-managed web applications or free web solutions.

The first updated version of the web represents web 1.0, which Berners-Lee refers to as the “read-only web.”

Advertisements on web pages while surfing the internet are prohibited in Web 1.0. In addition, in Web 1.0, Ofoto is a digital imaging website where users can store, share, view, and digital print photos. Web 1.0 is a content delivery network (CDN) that allows for displaying information on the website. It is suitable for use as a personal website and charges the user based on the number of pages viewed. It has directories that allow users to search for specific information.

Web 1.0 design elements:

Below are the four design elements of Web 1.0:

1. Static pages.
2. The server’s file system is used to serve content.
3. Pages are created through Server Side Includes or the Common Gateway Interface (CGI).
4. The elements on a page are positioned and aligned using frames and tables.

Web 2.0

Web 2.0 refers to websites worldwide that emphasise user-generated content, functionality, and interoperability for end users. It is also known as the participatory social web. It does not refer to a change in any technical specifications but rather to a change in how Websites are intended and used. The transition is advantageous, but this does not appear to be the case when the changes occur.

Web 2.0 allows cooperation and communication in a social media conversation as the creator of user-generated material in a virtual community. The Web 1.0 is a more refined version of Web 2.0.

Web 2.0 development uses web browser technologies such as AJAX and JavaScript frameworks. AJAX and Javascript code has recently gained popularity to create web 2.0 sites.

Web 2.0 has five major characteristics:

1. Users can recover and classify information jointly when it is sorted freely.
2. Dynamic material that reacts to user input.
3. Through evaluation and online commenting, the flow of information between the site owner and site users.
4. APIs were created to allow self-use, such as by a software program.
5. Web access raises concerns that range from the traditional Internet user base to a broader range of users.

2004- This year saw two significant developments that speeded up the development and adoption of Web 2.0: Google’s initial public offering (IPO) and the establishment of Facebook (now Meta). Both businesses are members of the FAANG group, which consists of the largest technology companies in the USA.

Web 2.0 usage

Many online tools and platforms are available on the social Web to share their viewpoints, thoughts, and experiences. Web 2.0 applications begin to socialise with the end customer much more. As a result, the end-user is still a user of the app and an attendee in the following eight tools:
1. Podcasting
2. Blogging
3. Tagging
4. RSS-based curation
5. Bookmarking on social media
6. Networking on the internet
7. The Internet of Things
8. Voting on web content

Web 3.0

It relates towards the evolution of web usage and interaction, which includes transforming the Web into a database. It empowers the web’s back-end to be upgraded after a long period of focusing on the front-end (Web 2.0 has mainly been about AJAX, tagging, and another front-end user-experience innovation).

Web 3.0 is a term used to describe many changes and developments of web usage and interaction among various paths. Data is not owned in this case but rather shared, with services displaying differing opinions for the same web/data.

The Semantic Web (3.0) promises to define “the world’s information” in a more sensible manner than Google’s current engine schema can. This is especially true in terms of machine conception instead of human comprehension.

The Semantic Web requires using an unambiguous ontological language, such as OWL, to create domain-specific conceptual frameworks that computers can use to reason about information and draw new conclusions, rather than simply matching keywords.

The following are five essential features that can help us define Web 3.0:

1. Semantic Web – The Semantic Web is the next step in the evolution of the Web. The semantic web enhances web innovations in demand for creating, sharing, and connecting content via query and retrieval based on understanding the meaning of words rather than search terms or numbers.

2. Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Using this capability in conjunction with natural language processing, computers in Web 3.0 can differentiate information like human beings to provide faster and more accurate results. They become much more intelligent in order to meet the needs of users.

3. Graphics in three dimensions – In Web 3.0, three-dimensional design is commonly used in sites and services. 3D graphics are used in various applications, including exhibition guides, computer games, e-commerce, and geo-spatial contexts.

4. Connectivity – Because of semantic metadata, information is more attached in Web 3.0. As a result, the user experience evolves to a higher level of communication that uses all available data.

5. Ubiquity – Application programs can access the information, every device is connected to the internet, and the facilities can be used anywhere.

Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0

Let us see the comparison between Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0

1. Technologies Associated with:

Web 1.0 is associated with below technologies:

• Web and File Servers
• Portals for Content and Enterprise
• Search Engines (including AltaVista and Yahoo!)
• E-mail accounts (Yahoo!, Hotmail)
• Peer-to-Peer File Sharing (Napster, BitTorrent)
• Technologies for Publishing and Subscription

Web 2.0 is associated with below technologies:

• Frameworks for Ajax and JavaScript
• Adobe Flex
• Microsoft.NET Framework, Enterprise Jave (Server side)
• Blogs
• Wikis
• IM (instant messaging)

Web 3.0 is associated with below technologies:

• Searching Using Semantics
• Databases of Information
• Ontologies
• Intelligent Digital Personal Assistants

2. Features

Features of web 1.0 are:

• Page hyperlinking and bookmarking
• There is no communication between the server and the user.
• Static websites existed.
• It only allowed for content browsing.

Features of web 2.0 are:

• Improved interaction.
• Functions such as video streaming, online documents, and so on are included.
• Web applications are being introduced.
• Everything goes online and is saved on servers.

Features of web 3.0 are:

• Web-based and intelligent
• functionalities and applications
• A synthesis of web technology and knowledge
• Reprographics (KR)

3. Definition (According to Burners-Lee)

Web 1.0 is considered read-only while web 2.0 is read-write and web 3.0 is read-write-execute

4. Usage years

Web 1.0 was common in between 1990-2000 while web 2.0 in 2000-2010 and web 3.0 is 2010-2020.

5. Connected Websites

Web 1.0 was connected with CNN only while web 2.0 with Flickr, youtube and blogger and web 3.0 with GoogleMaps and My Yahoo!

6. Types of web

Web 1.0 is simply web while web 2.0 is social web and web 3.0 is semantic web.

Web 3.0’s Potential and Drawbacks

The Web 3.0 has the possibility to just provide far greater utility to users, going far beyond the vast bulk of Web 2.0 applications used by consumers, such as social media, streaming, and internet ordering. Semantic Web, AI, and deep learning capabilities, which are at the heart of Web 3.0, have the potential to greatly expand application in new areas and vastly improve user interaction.

Web 3.0’s core features, such as decentralisation and permissionless systems, will also give users far more control over their personal data. This may help limit the practice of data extraction, which refers to information collected from web users without their consent or compensation.

As well as the network effects that have allowed technology behemoths to achieve near-monopolies through exploitative advertising and marketing practises.

Bottom Line

So we have seen the difference between Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0.

The web provides people with an ability with numerous opportunities that are not available through any other medium. It provides independence and liberty. However, if a website is not designed with accessibility guidelines in mind, it may exclude a demographic that stands to benefit the most from the internet. Most people have no intention of excluding people with a disability. As organisations and designers become more aware of and enforce accessibility, they will ensure that their content is accessible to a broader audience.

The Semantic Web (Web 3.0) promises to “organise the world’s information” in a far more logical manner than Google’s existing engine design could ever achieve. This is especially true in terms of machine comprehension versus human comprehension.

The Semantic Web necessitates using an unambiguous existential language, such as OWL, to generate domain-specific conceptual frameworks that machines can use to reason about data and draw new conclusions, rather than simply matching keywords. Web 2.0 has far-reaching consequences. It affects the people who use it socially, ethnically, and even electorally, as with all paradigm shifts.

Social networking sites and Wikis are all goods of Web 2.0 developers and designers. Especially who will be building it, not just because their technical skills will change. First, all information is defined so that both humans and machines can interpret it.

Second, various forms of language in which understanding is conveyed become interconnected and exchangeable with one another. Third, once knowledge is encoded in a linguistic form, it becomes available for public viewing to a wide range of rational engines at any time.