We all know that manual testing of applications takes a lot of time, effort, and resources too. Moreover, it is not possible to quickly test applications at any random time without having any manual intervention. Automation is used to reduce manual testing as much as possible.<\/p>\n
We already have many tools available in the market, with Selenium and UFT being some of them. So, in this article, we will see a complete comparison between the HP UFT and Selenium. So let’s start with Selenium vs UFT.<\/p>\n
Lets some some of the features to compare QTP vs Selenium.<\/p>\n
Selenium has the edge over the HP UFT, being an open-source product. Organizations that choose to implement Selenium can manipulate the architecture to their preference, and hence expect better performance at the time of tests.<\/p>\n
The UFT testing tool is licensed; you get a 60-days trial period, after which one has to buy the tool to perform further tests. Furthermore, UFT also charges a fee for upgrades, the license fee for acquisitions, and add-ons, which is a major difference between the Selenium and UFT.<\/p>\n
This is another area where the Selenium thumps HP UFT. The HP UFT being a traditional testing tool, runs only on the Windows OS, while, on the other hand, Selenium runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and UNIX too.<\/p>\n
A programming language is one of the major features of Selenium vs. UFT. Selenium testing can be done with the help of computer programming languages such as Java, C, Ruby, etc. The HP UFT tool uses only the VBScript language to perform its tests.<\/p>\n
The programming languages on Selenium can be adapted to the resources one has at the time of tests more efficiently. This is a significant difference between the Selenium and UFT.<\/p>\n
HP UFT is compatible with only four browser applications, which include the Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and Apple Safari.<\/p>\n
On the other hand, Selenium is compatible with more than nine different browsers, including IE 11, Android, Opera, HTML Unit, Apple Safari, Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Phantom JS, etc.<\/p>\n
One of the key differences between UFT and Selenium is that on Selenium, one uses Linux Virtual Machines, which are cheaper to maintain and run than HP UFT Windows Virtual Machine. The setup and maintenance time is also less in the Linux Virtual Machines than Windows Virtual Machines.<\/p>\n
Moreover, in Selenium, you can run simultaneous tests at a time on a single machine, whereas you could run and control only a single test on HP UFT.<\/p>\n
This is a major feature that considering the UFT vs. Selenium as UFT has test management, and Selenium does not. The feature does not really matter much to testers, but it is a huge advantage to the engineers. In UFT, integrated TD\/QC tracks the tests and generates necessary reports.<\/p>\n
You do not have an integrated tool on Selenium to generate and track tests, and it has to be done with the help of separate testing frameworks or any other third party integration.<\/p>\n
One of the most significant advantages that HP UFT tool has over the Selenium is its ability to run tests on the web applications as well as desktop applications. Selenium can only be used to do web application testing.<\/p>\n
This feature is limited by the fact that UFT is compatible only with the Windows platform and cannot run tests on other operating systems.<\/p>\n
Apart from these, some other difference between Selenium and UFT include-<\/strong><\/p>\n We hope that this UFT vs. Selenium article was helpful, and you now have a clear picture of what you might want. UFT has much more capabilities and functionalities than the Selenium, but it is limited in the flexibility and cost-effectiveness part.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" We all know that manual testing of applications takes a lot of time, effort, and resources too. Moreover, it is not possible to quickly test applications at any random time without having any manual...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":80319,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22825],"tags":[1546,22856,22855,22857],"class_list":["post-80316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-selenium-tutorials","tag-aws-php-sdk","tag-selenium-vs-qtp","tag-selenium-vs-uft","tag-uft-vs-selenium"],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n
\n Basis<\/b><\/td>\n Selenium<\/b><\/td>\n QTP<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Resource consumption during test scripts execution<\/span><\/td>\n Selenium takes low resource consumption.<\/span><\/td>\n QTP takes high resource consumption.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Object Repository\/Recovery Scenario<\/span><\/td>\n Selenium does not have any object repository.<\/span><\/td>\n QTP has its own in-built object repository.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Parameterization<\/span><\/td>\n Selenium needs to install some other programming language for parameterization.<\/span><\/td>\n QTP has a built-in tool for parameterization.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Dialog Box<\/span><\/td>\n Selenium supports the dialog box partially.<\/span><\/td>\n QTP supports all types of dialog box.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Software Type<\/span><\/td>\n Selenium is a set of APIs.<\/span><\/td>\n QTP is a windows based application.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Environments<\/span><\/td>\n It supports the additional plug-ins to include the features which are not available in Selenium.<\/span><\/td>\n QTP works on different environments like the Oracle, SAP, .NET, but needs to purchase an additional license.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Browser Controls<\/span><\/td>\n Selenium does not support browser controls.\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n QTP supports the favourites bar, backward and forward buttons.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Conclusion<\/h2>\n